![]() Want to design a theme park ride (or the theme park itself!), use AutoCAD. ![]() Because of this and the fact that AutoCAD has other suites enabling you with the tools to construct, build, manufacture and even demolish the building, the other all consensus for a large construction or manufacturing corporation would be AutoCAD.īy now, the idea pretty much is that if you want to take a skyscraper from a drawing on paper and turn it into a real tower of concrete and steel, you’re going to use AutoCAD. Hence the theater market, the interior design market and the production industry heavily rely on VectorWorks outstanding charms of rendering and lighting design where as the structure or construction oriented engineer will always be inclined to AutoCAD. VectorWorks is a good drafting/illustrating/rendering tool but is limited in its design to cater to projects on a comparatively smaller scale. The reason why VectorWorks couldn’t out do AutoCAD is the fact that AutoCAD is the best package for structural, large-scale design. With a host of packages ranging from Inventor to Revit and so on, AutoCAD has its roots rooted deep within the industry in almost every market. It does so by being the first to introduce new technology and having created standards for the industry. It is interesting to note, AutoCAD enjoys its dominance over the market even against the only product with more years under the belt. ![]() Unless your job requires you to use VectorWorks, or any other CAD package, the AutoCAD user base is large and the interface/work methodologies are common. Also, every professional drafter has to agree, drafting with AutoCAD is the swiftest way possible. “arc” means arc and it will draw that, with offsets, lines and even your custom macros mapped to simple commands makes the job way easier for those who have the patience and the stomach to digest AutoCAD’s capabilities. That said, one must never forget that AutoCAD has proven its rather long learning curve in the past, however, a large extent of users of both packages vote for AutoCAD’s straightforwardness such as with the command dialogue. Talking about 2D illustration and 3D design, both offer pretty much the same features but with a significant learning curve and marginal work efficacy.ĪutoCAD is considered the default standard, hence in comparison VectorWorks seems to be more attuned towards design in the aesthetic sense rather than the engineering sense of AutoCAD. Specifically stage management, space and lighting design (church/house/theater/hall illumination design and rendering) make the VectorWorks package a clear choice for any purpose of illumination. VectorWorks however enjoys a far smaller share of the market, and that too mutually with AutoCAD to some extent, that being the light development and design market. Look at the brief overview of the two softwares: Comparison AutoCAD VectorWorks Industry construction, pre/post-production Construction, architecture Strength Drafting, illustration, design and documentation Drafting, designing, rendering, BIM Discipline Mechanical, civil, automotive preliminary civil Users Engineering designers, drafters, students, hobbyist Construction designers, builders Learning curve Long, but beneficial Short What do both have to offer?ĪutoCAD, as we all know is the default choice of the professional market for a number of disciplines and from space craft parts to the Nike beneath your feat, AutoCAD has you covered for the design and illustration part. Lets see how and in what discipline they fair in this review of VectorWorks vs Autocad!īefore moving on you can also have a look at our previous articles Revit vs AutoCAD, CorelCAD vs AutoCAD, AutoCAD vs Draftsight and AutoCAD vs Inventor where we covered AutoCAD in detail as well. In terms of years of operation, VectorWorks is AutoCAD’s elder brother. This is the first review where AutoCAD’s two decades worth of legacy, reign and experience-based evolution falls short. Another great tool and strong contender popular in the theater and lighting design, VectorWorks was initially known as MiniCAD back when it was conceived in 1985. Once again, AutoCAD is pinned up against Nemetschek’s Vectorworks CAD package.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |